
Monday, September 3, 2007
Digital piracy rife

Terrorism

Terror during the French Revolution © The word 'terrorism' entered into European languages in the wake of the French revolution of 1789. In the early revolutionary years, it was largely by violence that governments in Paris tried to impose their radical new order on a reluctant citizenry. As a result, the first meaning of the word 'terrorism', as recorded by the Académie Française in 1798, was 'system or rule of terror'. This serves as a healthy reminder that terror is often at its bloodiest when used by dictatorial governments against their own citizens.
Sunday, May 20, 2007
http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Poverty.asp
by Anup Shah
Poverty is the state for the majority of the world’s people and nations. Why is this? Is it enough to blame poor people for their own predicament? Have they been lazy, made poor decisions, and been solely responsible for their plight? What about their government? Have they pursued policies that actually harm successful development? Such causes of poverty and inequality are no doubt real. But often less discussed are deeper and more global causes of poverty.
Behind the increasing interconnectedness promised by globalization, are global decisions, policies, and practices. These are typically influenced, driven, or formulated by the rich and powerful. These can be leaders of rich countries or other global actors such as multinational corporations, institutions, and influential people.
In the face of such enormous external influence, the governments of poor nations and their people are often powerless. As a result, in the global context, a few get wealthy while the majority struggle.
These next few articles and sections explore various poverty issues in more depth:
Structural Adjustment—a Major Cause of Poverty
Cutbacks in health, education and other vital social services around the world have resulted from International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank-prescribed structural adjustment policies as condition for loans and repayment. In addition, developing nation governments are required to open their economies to compete with each other and with more powerful and established industrialized nations. To attract investment, poor countries enter a spiraling race to the bottom to see who can provide lower standards, reduced wages and cheaper resources. This has increased poverty and inequality for most people. It also forms a backbone to what we today call globalization. As a result, it maintains the historic unequal rules of trade. Read article: Structural Adjustment—a Major Cause of Poverty
Poverty Around The World
Inequality is increasing around the world while the world appears to globalize. Even the wealthiest nation has the largest gap between rich and poor compared to other developed nations. In many cases, international politics and various interests have led to a diversion of available resources from domestic needs to western markets. Historically, politics and power play by the elite leaders and rulers have increased poverty and dependency. These have often manifested themselves in wars, hot and cold, which have often been trade and resource-related. Mercantilist practices, while presented as free trade, still happen today. Poverty is therefore not just an economic issue, it is also an issue of political economics.
My View
From the above article i cannot help but agree with the author. Poverty is indeed a major issue in this world. It is prevailant everywhere, be it in a developing nation, or in a wealthy nation, poverty exists. Throughout the years, the situation has yet to improve much although steps have been taken to improve it. It is not an easy problem to deal with in the first place.
What causes poverty? It is difficult to explain but there are many factors which cause it. Factors such as work attitude of people, their qualifications, governments and basically which country they live in.
I believe that the government plays acrucial role. They are the ones that represent the people and the nation and are the ones that reach out to other parts of the world. i am sure that governments from all nations wish to eradicate poverty but it seems to me that it is impossible. To have a nation without poverty is almost comparable to Utopia, which in this case, imposssible to achieve. From the article, the world is driven by globalization and decisions, policies and pratices are influenced by the rich and powerful. Naturally, rich and powerful people decides what is best for people like them and not what is best for the world. In this case, the poor people may have been neglected. Like what the author said, in the face of such enormous influence, governments of poor nations and their people are often powerless. In order to attract investment, poor countries enter a spiraling race to the bottom to see who can provide lower standards, reduced wages and cheaper resources. This has increased poverty and inequality for most people.
conserving our natural world
by Anup Shah
http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/Nature.asp?p=1
As explained in the biodiversity section of this web site, conservation of ecosystems and the species within them would help to maintain the natural balances disrupted by recent human activity.
A report from the global conservation organization, WWF, has suggested that humans have destroyed more than 30 percent of the natural world since 1970.
However desirable conservation may seem, in reality it is a struggle.
It’s an Uphill Struggle to Conserve
Unfortunately, despite the effort put into conservation by organizations and activists, their work can easily be undermined by those who have other interests. This occurs, for example, from illegal poaching, to influencing or manipulating laws designed to protect species.
The current form of globalization has also been criticized for ignoring sustainable development and environmental concerns. For many years, critics, NGOs, activists and affected peoples have been accusing large corporations for being major sources of environmental problems.
Consequently, helping species and ecosystems to survive becomes more difficult.
My View
After reading this article, i must say i was shocked. Not because this is something new to me, which is not the case as i have read many articles concerning the conservation of the ecosystem. it was the part which stated that we humans have destroyed more than 30% of the natural world since 1970. All these destructions were caused by our actions.
About 30 years have passed since 1970 and we have already destroyed 30%of our natural world. this comes to about 10% every 10 years. At this rate we are going, in the next 70 years we are going to completely wipe out the entire natural world! Tell me this news isn't shocking!
From the article, conservation organisations and activists have put in a lot of effort in trying to stop the destruction of the natural world and their efforts sometimes go unnoticed. Why? Because there are selfish people out there who only care about their personal interest and the world revolves only around them. From illegal poaching to manipulating laws designed to protect the endangered species, nothing seem to be able to stop them. They do not realise the damage that they are doing. They are disrupting the ecosystem and the species within them which maintains the natural balance.
However they might argue that they are resorting to all these actions to make a living. But does making a living include actions which put others in disadvantage? Laws are implemented for a reason and not something for someone to manipulate and feel great about it. Think about it, the declining numbers of endangered animals getting wiped out at this rate, extinction is on inevitable. Can you imagine one day when your child can only know how a lion or a tiger look like through picture books and not be able to actually see them because they have extinct as a result of our actions? Scary isn't it but it is one possible scenario.
It is difficult to come down on people or companies that are destroying the natural world, but if the government believes in the importance of conserving the natural world, then i believe that they would be able to slow down the rate of destruction. We must all cooperate and work together, along with organisations to raise awareness on conservatism of our natural world. Ways such as giving talks in schools and organising fairs and exhibition to educate people.
In conclusion, i really hope that people would think not only about ourselves but also about the world we are passing on to the next generation and also think about what kind of world we would want to see.
Thursday, March 1, 2007
Climate Change and Global Warming
by Anup Shah
http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/GlobalWarming.asp?p=1
Global warming and climate change is looked at in this section of the global issues web site. Introduced are some of the effects of climate change. In addition, this section attempts to provide insights into what governments, companies, international institutions, and other organizations are attempting to do about this issue, as well as the challenges they face. Some of the major conferences in recent years are also discussed.
Climate Change and Global Warming Introduction
The climate is changing. The earth is warming up, and there is now overwhelming scientific concensus that it is happening, and human-induced. With global warming on the increase and species and their habitats on the decrease, chances for ecosystems to adapt naturally are diminishing. Many are agreed that climate change may be one of the greatest threats facing the planet. Recent years show increasing temperatures in various regions, and/or increasing extremities in weather patterns. This section looks at what causes climate change, what the impacts are and where scientific concensus currently is. Last updated Thursday, February 08, 2007.
Read article: Climate Change and Global Warming Introduction
Global Dimming
Research has shown that air pollutants from fossil fuel use make clouds reflect more of the sun’s rays back into space. This leads to an effect known as global dimming whereby less heat and energy reaches the earth. At first, it sounds like an ironic savior to climate change problems. However, it is believed that global dimming caused the droughts in Ethiopia in the 1970s and 80s where millions died, because the northern hemisphere oceans were not warm enough to allow rain formation. Global dimming is also hiding the true power of global warming. By cleaning up global dimming-causing pollutants without tackling greenhouse gas emissions, rapid warming has been observed, and various human health and ecological disasters have resulted, as witnessed during the European heat wave in 2003, which saw thousands of people die.
Carbon Sinks, Forests and Climate Change
A mechanism suggested for tackling climate change and warming has been the idea of using “Carbon Sinks” to soak up carbon dioxide. To aid in this, reforestation, or planting of new forests, have been suggested. This is a popular strategy for the logging industry and nations with large forests interests. While there may be some potential in this solution, it cannot be effective on its own. This is because it legitimizes continued destruction of old-growth and pristine forests which are rich ecosystems and have an established biodiversity base (albeit shrinking now) that naturally maintain the environment (at no cost!). Creating new forest areas would require the creation of entire ecosystems. It is also criticized for being a quick fix that does not tackle the root causes effectively and does not lead to, or promote actual emissions reduction. Last updated Tuesday, October 29, 2002.
Global Warming and Population
It seems there has been a recent interest in associating climate change/global warming with “over population” and that countries such as China and India have to do more to help contain global warming.
Yet rich countries have a lot to do themselves. There were agreed reasons why developing countries were exempt from initial greenhouse gas emission targets: it was the emissions from rich countries that accumulated in the atmosphere for so long to trigger climate change. Posted Thursday, February 01, 2007.
MY VIEW
After reading this article, i must say i was shocked to see the Earth "dying" so quickly and we, the humans, living on this beautiful planet which gave us life, are the ones killing it. It is almost like we humans are biting the hand that feeds us. Our technologies are getting more and more advanced by the day but it is ironic that the more advanced it gets, the more it spoils the Earth. We are using so much energy to support our technologies and where do the source come from? Yes! From the Earth it self! We are buring so much natural fuel such as oil and fossil fuel that we are almost running out of them. As a result, not only do we take natural fuel but we also release the harmful gases back to the atmosphere after burning them! I cant't imagine how can do such things without feeling the least bit guilty.
As well probably notice or know, our planet is getting warmer and signs of global warming are showing. Change in temperatures, rise in ocean levels, holes in the ozone layer, weather extremities( remember when Singapore rained non-stop for 24hrs and flooded many areas?) and also air quality. Scientists had warned us many times about the dangers of global warming and how quickly it is coming but their warnings had fallen on deaf ears. Car manufactureres are still building high capacity engine cars which, unfortunatel, guzzle oil by the liters and spewing out harmful admissions to the environment. Some companies can argue that they had come out with hybrid cars but is it popular enough to actually make a differance? I doubt so.
Studies have shown that when temperature increases, the huge ice glaciers will melt, resulting in the rise of ocean levels and may totally submerge low-lying countries or cities such as Vanice. Holes in the ozone layer also means that we are exposed to harmful rays from the Sun, which may cause cancer and other illnesses. Other regions are also experiencing weather extremities including Singapore. Air pollution is considered to be one of the more serious problems. When we breath in the polluted air, we also take in harmful gases in the air and over a long period of time, our lungs may get so damaged that one day it will fail prematurely and to those suffering from asthma, won't they die even faster?
Although all these scenarios may not happen for a long time to come, one might think, maybe when this day do arrive, i may be already dead! So why should i care? Well, it is not what happens to you but what will happen to the future genereation? If we leave them a planet in such a bad state, how are they going to survive? Isn't it unfair that they suffer for the consequences when we were the ones who caused them?
On the good side, measures have been taken by some countries in a bid to slow down global warming such as reforestation. Forest are extremely important as they take in unwanted gases and gives out oxygen, so it is important we do not cut them down! We can also play a part in saving our Earth such as using energy conserving appliances, turning off the lighs when we are not using them and use eco-friendly bio-fuel. Together, we are the ones who can make the differance!
Racism(social issues)
by Anup Shah
Racism is a very touchy subject for some, as issues concerning free speech and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights come into play. Some people argue that it is just words. Others point out that these words can lead to some very dire and serious consequences (World War II being an example.)
Europe is often one of the first places people think of when racism is discussed. From the institutionalized racism, especially in colonial times, when racial beliefs — even eugenics — were not considered something wrong, to recent times where the effects of neo-Nazism is still felt. Europe is a complex area with many cultures in a relatively small area of land that has seen many conflicts throughout history. (Note that most of these conflicts have had trade and resource access at their core, but national identities have often added fuel to some of these conflicts.)
Racism has also been used to justify exploitation, even using “pseudo-science”:
Debates over the origins of racism often suffer from a lack of clarity over the term. Many conflate recent forms of racism with earlier forms of ethnic and national conflict. In most cases ethno-national conflict seems to owe to conflict over land and strategic resources. In some cases ethnicity and nationalism were harnessed to wars between great religious empires (for example, the Muslim Turks and the Catholic Austro-Hungarians). As Benedict Anderson has suggested in Imagined Communities, ethnic identity and ethno-nationalism became a source of conflict within such empires with the rise of print-capitalism.
In its modern form, racism evolved in tandem with European exploration and conquest of much of the rest of the world, and especially after Christopher Columbus reached the Americas. As new peoples were encountered, fought, and ultimately subdued, theories about “race” began to develop, and these helped many to justify the differences in position and treatment of people whom they categorized as belonging to different races (see Eric Wolf’s Europe and the People Without History).
Another possible source of racism is the misunderstanding of Charles Darwin’s theories of evolution. Some took Darwin’s theories to imply that since some “races” were more civilized, there must be a biological basis for the difference. At the same time they appealed to biological theories of moral and intellectual traits to justify racial oppression. There is a great deal of controversy about race and intelligence, in part because the concepts of both race and IQ are themselves controversial.
— Racism, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, May 1, 2004
In “the century of total war”, and the new millenium, Europe is seeing an alarming resurgence in xenophobia and racial hatred.
A short review from the Inter Press Service highlights the rise of neo-Nazism in 2000 in Europe and suggests that “far from being a fringe activity, racism, violence and neo-nationalism have become normal in some communities. The problems need to tackled much earlier, in schools and with social programmes.”
Ethnic minorities and different cultures in one country can often be used as a scapegoat for the majority during times of economic crisis. That is one reason why Nazism became so popular.
In France, May 2002, the success of far right politician Le Pen in the run for leadership (though he lost out in the end) sent a huge shockwave throughout Europe, about how easy it was for far right parties to come close to getting power if there is complacency in the democratic processes and if participation is reduced.
In various places throughout Western Europe, in 2002, as Amnesty International highlights, there has been a rise in racist attacks and sentiments against both Arabs and Jews, in light of the increasing hostilities in the Middle East.
Earlier in 1998, in an area of Germany a right wing racist party won an unprecedented number of votes.
In Austria, the Freedom Party was able to secure the majority of the cabinet posts. The party is an extreme far right party, whose leader, Jorg Heider, has been accused of sympathetic statements towards the Nazis. The European Union has reacted to this indicating that Austria’s participation may be in jeopardy. This Guardian Special Report has much more in-depth coverage.
In Italy, there are attempts to try and deal with the rise in undocumented immigrants from Tunisia. The reactions from the right wing have been labeled by some as being “openly racist”.
In 1997, Human Rights Watch noted that, “The U.K. has one of the highest levels of racially-motivated violence and harassment in Western Europe, and the problem is getting worse.” In April 1999, London saw two bombs explode in predominantly ethnic minority areas, in the space of one week, where a Nazi group has claimed responsibility. The summer of 2001 saw many race-related riots in various parts of northern England.
Spain has seen increased racial violence lately. The growing economy invites immigrants from North African countries such as Morocco. However, the poor conditions that immigrants have had to endure and the already racially charged region has led to friction and confrontations.
Greece has one of the worst records in the European Union for racism against ethnic minorities, according to the BBC. Anti-immigrant sentiment has long been high, especially against ethnic Albanians, who form the largest minority. Until the 1990s, the BBC notes, Greece had been an extremely homogenous society. With the fall of communism many immigrants from Eastern Europe came to Greece. Albanians especially have been targetted by a lot of racist sentiment. Some hostage taking by a few Albanians in recent years has not helped the situation.
So far, the above represents an incredibly tiny number of examples and details. Many, many more events haven’t been mentioned, as it is admittedly difficult to keep up with all the different items. For more details and up-to-date information, one web site to check out the UK-based Institute of Race Relations and their subsection attemping to document the rising support for the extreme-Right in local and central government in Europe, building on a platform of populist anti-immigrant policies.
http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Racism.asp
MY VIEW
Why did i choose the topic on racism? The reason is very simple. I feel that it is one of the more serious social issues our world is facing.
I remember when i was in secondary one, we read a book called Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry. It is about racism in the olden days of Americans. The whites did not like the idea of blacks calling themselves American and they also see themselves superior to the blacks. In the book, the whites could murder or steal from the black people without getting punished and the black people were also too afraid to report on the whites as they may end up getting punished.
Even in Singapore, where many people think that we are one big harmonious family and people of different races are treated equally. I agree only to a certain extend. From newspaper articles, i have read about Singaporeans practicing racism, from scholars to working adults. Although the majority population can live with one another peacefully and harmoniously, there is a minority of the population who just think that others, who are not the same race as he or she, is inferior.
Indeed, racism is a "touchy" sunject which one should not try and mess around with. A wrong word or a slip of tongue can land you in big trouble not only with the ethnic group you have insulted but also the law. One could be fined or jailed for being racist or do anything that is related to racism. I feel that our law is right to get tough on those who are racist. Racist people are a bane to the society. They not only spoil the harmony among the people but also tarnish the country's image and may lead to severe consequences. Do we want Singapore to be like Europe like what the article had mentioned, to be among the few places people would think when issues of racism are being discussed? Certainly not! In fact, if we are a racist society, Singapore would be in big trouble! Civil wars happening every now and then, citizens of different races refusing to live together....etc. Would we be able to enjoy the peace and prosperity that we are enjoying now if we are a racist country? No! Come to think of it, we did use to be racist in the olden days, where chinese and the malays were fighting among themselves. Many innocent people who just want to live in peace got killed just because a few racist jokers started making niose! Luckily our government did a good job in handling the situation then. Even till this day, our government goes all out to crack down on racism which occurs most frequently in blogs. Many people think that their blog is a private place and thus vent their personal frustration on a particular race. Due to their carelessness and ignorance, they were caught by the government and severly punished.
Some examples of consequences should Singapore face if she was a racist country are relationship and ties with other countries, bad image and population problems. Let us look at relationships and ties with other countrys. If you noticed, we are surrounded by countries of different ethnics, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand...etc. If we were racist, these countries whom we have close ties with will be broken due to our racist beliefs. Much of our food, materials and other products come from these countries. How are we going to survive if we do not have close ties with them and worst, all our other neighbouring countries or maybe the whole world hate us? Won't we be vulnerable then since we are such a small country after all? Also, even if we are racist, there are always people who tolerate people of other religion and just want to live in peace, they may just end up migrating to other countries where peace and harmony prevails. Singapore would lose much of its man-power from the already little man-power we have.
it is our responsibility to curb racism. I am guilty of not playing a part in helping to curb it but i have since promised myself to help fight against racism. One does not need to command the military to stop racism. Simple things like disapproving of someone else's racist jokes or comments, and being sensitive to people's feelings can help stop racism. I sincerely hope that to those who are reading this entry now to help stop racism so that not only Singapore but the world can be a more peacful place to live in.